They drawl with absent legitimacy and Anton rule of international law deliberately disabled.
At a high-level meeting in the General Assembly of the United Nations the Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is still ambitious and underlining in his speech amid the timing of the meeting:
“The United Nations Charter, the Constitution of the international community, provides indispensable tools for the rule of law, is the General Assembly: The international force for the development of standards, and the UN Security Council: the Implementation Force, International Court of Justice: the power of judicial giving the international community the basis for cooperation and a solution to the conflicts peacefully , and tools to ensure not to return to the
fighting. “
And was not this the goal of instituting the United Nations? But did the institution maintain these goals? Or it handed over negative negligent situation and led to new wars disasters with greater international cover and effective penetrating international legitimacy above the international influence of the defeatist nations?
Ban Ki-moon sounds optimistic in a world groaning under the murder: “It is the development of accountability mechanisms. No war criminal will find any safe asylum in the modern world. Sovereingty of law is an essential matter to develop and achieve developmental objectives to the Millennium “.
Are we still crawling to develop accounting’ mechanisms for war criminals? Therefrore, why do you meet each other every year?
This is the Secreatry-General of the United Nations and this is his saying which is considered as a basic document, but weakness of applying the law and the sovereingly of international legitimacy, who hold responsible to settle this matter with “the United Nations”? And who will pilgrimage of the people of dissolving (a parliament) and to contract in it with their obligation and taking an oath of their international business contract agreements?
Queries (questions) must be fundamental topic for discussion including the agenda of the General Assembly of the United Nations before international bloody lawsuits can discuss the struggle.
And at same dome and occasion — the United Nations — Nabil
Al Arabi, Secretary-General of the Arab League, was more clear, frank and objective, hence he said in journalistic conference: of states clearer and more explicit and objective, he said at a news conference:
“Contemporary international system is minor (underage), it has risen in 1945 on the basis that the world does not want to see a war like World War II, and if there is what could be considered as an act of aggression, the Security Council will deter it. But the Security Council does not do this, and the Arab League can not do this alone. Whereas, the problem is that the contemporary international system should be reconsidered. “Elaraby said the truth …other than why
the Emir H H Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani else claimed to put Arab deterrence troops and interference in Syria must be by Arabs, it expresses despair Member States at the United Nations from it and from instruments — dedication of law sovereignty as its Secretary-General alleged — to deter violence even at the level of “one-state” toward dictatorships and war criminals a war against their own nations and against human rights. Was the task of Annan beneficial, that also the task of Brahimi is also beneficial?
The equation is simple: The beneficiaries from the continuation of assassinations are firstly members in languid nations, and secondly including them the most powerful in the Security Council and the right of veto to revoke the sovereignty of international law.
And on the other dreamer side of the United Nations and in confronting violence against religions and cultures they are saying with the alliance of civilisations! They are calling it and putting a high group, lofty delegate for her high range and a senior envoy in the United Nations and call it: UNAOC, recommend it and to undertake the reins of their initatives power and membership of high group of its senior high level, we take the reins of their initiatives and group membership senior high level, and we really is the first who applied its concept before and after that both saying and work.
George Sampaio — Former Portuguese President, the senior representative of the United Nations (UN) to the All Alliance of Civilizations is living Utopia such as “Moon”, then he announced in his essay in the Middle East on October 7, 2012 to reinforce cultural understanding, declaring that the discontent on the offensive and provocative film produced in naturally mysterious circumstances and it is not acceptable from any Believer whether if he is Muslim or Christian or Jews, and everyone is entitled to protection considering it as a right that it must be claimed and billed through peacful legal channels within the limits of the law.
Sampaio repeats Colia Zaat Utopia (Moon) are “peaceful legal channels in the limits of the law” without putting their penetrating on it as their influence. And the people of the member States in the United Nations repeat: About what law your are speaking at each meeting? And about any international legitimacy? And about any tools the United Nations think that, they are still in her hand?
Are our tools are still really: the General Assembly? Or the Security Council? Or the International Court of Justice? Or Semitic groups for high-level alliances of severe fertilization theory where scholastic branches to be born breed verbal multiply to no avail. What for you are talking nations about some tools are with us or against us?
And “its protectors are its thieves (robbers)”……then, break open the tools of Peoples’ despair and link of international disagreement.
