WASHINGTON: The debate over whether the US government is violating citizens’ privacy rights while trying to protect them from terrorism escalated dramatically amid reports that authorities have collected data on millions of phone users and tapped into servers at nine internet companies.
The White House spent much of the day defending the National Security Agency’s (NSA) secret collection of telephone records from millions of Americans as a “critical tool” for preventing attacks, as critics called the programme — first reported by Britain’s Guardian newspaper — a heavy-handed move that raised new questions about the extent of the US government’s spying on its citizens.
The flap over the NSA’s mining of data from customers of a subsidiary of Verizon Communications was overtaken by a Washington Post report that described an even more aggressive programme of government surveillance.
The Post reported that the NSA and the FBI have been tapping “directly” into the central servers of leading US internet companies to gain access to emails, photographs, audio, video, documents, connection logs and other information that enable analysts to track a person’s movements and contacts over time.
Some of the companies named in the article — Google, Apple, Yahoo and Facebook — immediately denied that the government had “direct access” to their central servers. Microsoft said it does not voluntarily participate in any government data collection and only complies “with orders for requests about specific accounts or identifiers”.
James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, said the report contained “numerous inaccuracies.” Washington Post spokeswoman Kristine Coratti said the paper stood by its report, which was based on an NSA document that it published online.
Taken together, the reports suggested that US domestic surveillance, long acknowledged to have become more prevalent since the September 11, 2001 attacks, was far more extensive than the public knew.
The Post said that the secret programme involving the internet companies, code-named PRISM and established under Republican president George W Bush in 2007, had seen “exponential growth” during the past several years under Democratic President Barack Obama. The Post said an NSA report had found that the agency “increasingly relies on PRISM” as its leading source of raw material, accounting for nearly 1 in 7 intelligence reports.
Technology companies taking part in the programme, the Post said, include Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube and Apple.
Clapper indicated that the reports were indeed significant but disputed the notion that government agents could use such data without a specific investigative purpose in mind. He also said the program does not allow the government to listen in on anyone’s phone calls. “The unauthorised disclosure of information about this important and entirely legal programme is reprehensible and risks important protections for the security of Americans,” he said in a statement.
The reports drew attention to US authorities’ use of a secret federal court, the US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which reviews and approves investigators’ requests to conduct extraordinary surveillance in national security cases.
The NSA surveillance programmes are among thousands of operations approved by the court in the years since the 9/11 attacks. Under federal law, Congress is briefed about the court’s actions.
For civil libertarians and other critics of expanded secret surveillance, the revelations amounted to a reminder of how the 9/11 attacks increased the government’s reach into Americans’ daily lives.
Before the Post’s report, leading members of Congress defended the agency’s efforts to build a database of phone records for use in investigations. They said the programme had been going on for seven years. Republican Mike Rogers of Michigan, chairman of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, said the surveillance effort had stopped a “significant” attack plot within the United States, but did not give details.
“It’s called protecting America,” added Senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee. But there also was a diverse group of Republicans and Democrats who blasted the gathering of such a huge database of details about Americans’ phone habits as an unwarranted intrusion.
“The United States should not be accumulating phone records on tens of millions of innocent Americans. That is not what democracy is about. That is not what freedom is about,” said Senator Bernie Sanders, a liberal independent from Vermont.
Conservative Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky called the programme “an astounding assault on the Constitution” and said the Obama administration “had sunk to a new low.”
The Wall Street Journal reported that the NSA’s monitoring of Americans includes customer records from AT&T Inc and Sprint Nextel Corp in addition to Verizon, as well as emails and Web searches. The agency also has cataloged credit-card transactions, the Journal said.
Reuters
