CHAIRMAN: DR. KHALID BIN THANI AL THANI
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: PROF. KHALID MUBARAK AL-SHAFI

Default / Miscellaneous

Rift on rights ‘damaged’ 2013 Commonwealth meeting

Published: 19 Nov 2013 - 06:41 am | Last Updated: 28 Jan 2022 - 08:31 pm

COLOMBO: A bitter division at a weekend summit over allegations of war crimes by its Sri Lankan hosts damaged the Commonwealth, a post-colonial club already struggling for relevance, according to observers.

Sri Lanka had hoped the three-day summit in Colombo would showcase its post-war revival, while the Commonwealth wanted to focus on equitable economic growth and debt relief for smaller countries, among other issues.

Instead the summit was dogged by a public dispute between Britain’s David Cameron and Sri Lanka President Mahinda Rajapakse over allegations his government’s troops killed as many as 40,000 civilians at the end of the country’s 37-year ethnic conflict.

“It was not a success,” said Ronald Sanders, a former Caribbean diplomat from Guyana who is now a senior research fellow at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies in London. 

“No conference dominated by fatal dissension among Commonwealth members about its venue (and) its chairmanship (Rajapakse)... could be counted as a success,” Sanders, who was part of a team of experts compiling recommendations for a Commonwealth charter on common values, said.

“Instead, it weakened the Commonwealth.” Leaders of three countries -- Commonwealth heavyweight Canada, India and Mauritius -- stayed away from the summit, which is held every two years, in protest over Sri Lanka’s rights record against ethnic minority Tamils.

David Cameron then stole the limelight by repeatedly threatening to push for an international probe through UN bodies into the allegations, unless Rajapakse’s government completed its own investigation by next March.

Cameron travelled to the island’s former warzone of Jaffna to draw attention to the issue and flew out of Sri Lanka before the summit ended.

Rajapakse in turn warned he would not be pushed “into a corner” on the issue, while the mostly pro-government Sri Lankan media said Cameron’s ultimatum had colonial overtones.

Although the issue dominated the headlines, the Commonwealth’s lengthy final communiqué released on Sunday did not mention the war crimes allegations.

Instead it restated the commitment of the 53-member bloc of mainly former British colonies to its set of common values which includes human rights, democracy and the rule of law.

At a final heated press conference, media ignored Commonwealth spokesman Richard Uko’s plea not to focus on the rights issue, while the editor of a pro-government Sri Lankan newspaper accused Uko of a “sinister conspiracy” of only taking questions from the foreign press.

Charu Lata Hogg, from international affairs think-tank Chatham House in London, said the Commonwealth’s decision not to tackle the issue head-on damaged its credibility.

AFP