![]()
Hugs and misses: Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif (left), EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and US Secretary of State John Kerry after a statement on the new deal in Geneva yesterday.
DUBAI: Sunni-ruled Gulf monarchies feel let down by their US ally and want good relations with their Shia neighbour Iran but also fear the Geneva nuclear deal will boost its regional ambitions, analysts say.
Saudi Arabia and the oil- and gas-rich nations of the Gulf were weighing their reactions yesterday hours after the agreement was signed between Iran and Western powers.
Tehran agreed to curb its nuclear programme in the breakthrough interim deal that world powers claimed was the biggest step in decade-long efforts to deny Iran an atomic bomb.
But Gulf states have never made a secret of their concerns about Iranian regional ambitions. “In principle, the Gulf states want good relations with Iran,” Saudi analyst Jamal Khashoggi said. “But the (Geneva) agreement has reduced the Iran problem to the nuclear level only, while its regional interference is of key concern to these countries.” Khashoggi said Gulf states “fear Iran will see this accord as encouragement to act with a free hand in the region”.
Tehran is a key backer of Syrian President Bashar Al Assad, of the Shia Alawite sect, in his fight against a nearly three-year insurrection.
The Islamic republic is also seen as feeding instability in Bahrain and Yemen through the Shia communities there. But President Barack Obama moved quickly to reassure US allies, saying Washington “will remain firm, as will our commitment to our friends and allies — particularly Israel and our Gulf partners, who have good reason to be sceptical about Iran’s intentions.”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dismissed the nuclear agreement, calling it “not a historic agreement but rather a historic mistake”. He reiterated Israel’s right to defend itself, and his hawkish foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman said “all options are on the table”. The Gulf states and Israel do not see eye-to-eye on Iran, said Khashoggi, adding that “the main problem of the Jewish state is (its own) nuclear” capability.
‘Not negative, but not enough’
For Saudi analyst Anwar Eshki, head of the Jeddah-based Middle East Centre for Strategic and Legal Studies, the deal “is not negative, but it is not enough”.
Under the Geneva agreement, Iran will limit its nuclear programme in exchange for $7bn (¤5.2bn) in sanctions relief. Over the next six months, Iran and the United States, China, Russia, France, Britain and Germany are to negotiate a more comprehensive deal. “We are worried,” said Eshki, pointing to the $7bn.
“We need to know whether these funds will be used by the Iranian regime for its own people, or to further finance crises in the region,” he said, listing Gulf nations’ grievances with Iran. Tehran “stokes sectarian tensions between Sunnis and Shias and fuels crisis-hit areas of the Arab world, in Syria, Lebanon and Yemen”, in addition to its territorial dispute over Gulf islands with the United Arab Emirates. Distrust of Iran among Gulf states is fed by the fear that their traditional protector and ally the United States has abandoned them.
Saudi Arabia, main backer of the Syrian opposition, took issue with Obama for not attacking Syria in September despite evidence the regime used chemical weapons against its own people, killing hundreds of civilians.
According to Khashoggi, officials in Gulf countries feel the Obama administration “is no longer interested in regional problems” in the Middle East.
This stand-off approach by Washington to the oil-producing region comes with the United States set to become the world’s top oil producer by 2015, because of booming shale oil output. “Countries in the region no longer have any confidence in the United States,” said Emirati analyst Abdulkhaleq Abdullah.
For him, Washington “was over-zealous” in seeking to reach a speedy agreement with Iran’s new president, Hassan Rouhani. “But they (Gulf states) do retain confidence in other allies France and Germany,” he said, noting that the deal is “good in that it was agreed between Iran and the international community, not Iran and the US”. Abdullah said Gulf nations “may end up being the main beneficiaries of this agreement as it should defuse tensions in the region”.AFP
Main reactions to Iran nuclear deal
US President Barack Obama
“Today, the United States — together with our close allies and partners - took an important first step toward a comprehensive solution that addresses our concerns with the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear programme.”
US Secretary of State John Kerry
“This first step, I want to emphasise, actually rolls back the programme from where it is today, enlarges the breakout time, which would not have occurred unless this agreement existed. It will make our partners in the region safer. It will make our ally Israel safer.”
Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei:
“God’s grace and the support of the Iranian nation were the reasons behind this success. Resistance against excessive demands should be the criteria for (nuclear) officials.”
Iranian President Hassan Rowhani:
“This agreement benefits all regional countries and global peace. Constructive engagement in addition to tireless efforts by negotiating teams are to open new horizons.”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:
“What was achieved yesterday in Geneva is not a historic agreement but rather a historic mistake.”
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman
“This agreement is the greatest diplomatic victory of Iran, which has gained recognition for its so-called legitimate right to enrich uranium.”
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov
“Nobody lost, everyone ends up winning... We are convinced that Iran will cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency in good faith.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi
“This agreement will help to uphold the international nuclear non-proliferation system, (and) safeguard peace and stability in the Middle East.”
British Foreign Secretary William Hague
The deal is “good for the whole world, including Middle Eastern countries and the people of Iran themselves”.
French President Francois Hollande:
“The interim accord reached overnight is an important step in the right direction... towards stopping Iran’s military nuclear programme and therefore normalising our ties.”
French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius
The accord “confirms Iran’s right to civilian nuclear energy but rules out access to the nuclear weapon.”
European Union President Herman Van Rompuy
“It is now crucial to ensure punctual implementation of the agreement reached and to continue working, on the basis of the trust that is being built, towards a definitive settlement of this issue.”
Syrian Foreign Ministry
Syria “considers it to be a historic accord which guarantees the interests of the brotherly Iranian people and acknowledges their right to the peaceful use of nuclear energy.”