Mumbai: Actors, movie makers and other members of the film fraternity yesterday reacted strongly to the ban imposed by the Tamil Nadu government on Kamal Hassan’s controversial film Vishwaroopam. This is what they had to say:
Shabana Azmi: The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Prakash Jha’s film Aarakshan that once a movie was cleared by the Censor Board Of Film Certification no state can impose a ban on a film. It is the government’s business to give value to its own certification and ensure the film is shown. Those who protest have the right to do so. But if they do so violently then the law of the land must apply to them.
If people are offended by Vishwaroopam let them not watch the film. How can they take away the right of others who want to watch it? The Tamil Nadu government is being unfair to Vishwaroopam and to the minorities it claims to protect.
For starters, have they even watched the film? India’s audience is not a monolith. Some may be moved, some may be offended, or claim to be offended for political gains. So be it. Nobody is forcing the film down anyone’s throat. The space for freedom of expression is shrinking and we must act now to stem the tide.
Shyam Benegal: What is happening to Kamal’s film is very peculiar. It reeks of some kind of a vendetta. It doesn’t make any sense. The fact is the hero of the film plays a patriotic Muslim doing good things for the country.
They’ve simply gone against their own rules. Once the censor board clears the film and if any section of the audience has any doubts or fears, the matter must be referred back to the censor board. You (the state) cannot do things entirely on your own. If you are doing things on your own then why have the censor board in the first place? A censor certificate is valid in the entire country, and should not be disregarded in one state. A censor certificate has semi-judicial status.
R Balki: What if all the people, Muslims or Hindus, who have no issues with the film want a ban on the government? Will the courts hear that? We are scared of law and order issues because of the government.
Kalpana Lajmi: Once the certificate of release is issued by the censor board and after the film is released, no private or judicial institution or government, be it the state or centre, should exercise its diktat and influence to ban the film, whatsoever be its content. A ban is also tantamount to curbing the freedom of expression.
Ketan Mehta: This is complete nonsense. The government is succumbing to cultural terrorism in spite of the censor board clearing the film. Isn’t freedom of expression a fundemental right? Democracy is meaningless without it. Please stop this recurring blackmail of creativity and the arts.
Priyadarshan: Nobody has the right to ban the freedom of expression.
Subhash Kapoor: I think this is an attack on freedom of expression of a filmmaker. It is not only undemocratic but also sets a dangerous precedent. The state should not succumb to such pressure tactics by politically motivated groups.
Anusha Rizvi: The ban is ridiculous and needs to be condemned in the strongest possible terms. Our cultural space is increasingly being taken over by the right-wing discourse. All of us need to be on guard against this invasion of freedom and we must protest against it. I stand by Kamal Haasan and am deeply alarmed at the decision taken by the Tamil Nadu government.
Khushboo: If this can happen to a man who has put in 50 years and every penny he has earned into films, and someone who eats, drinks, breathes and lives for the love of cinema, I wonder what lies in store for others.
Mani Shankar: It’s a gross travesty of creative freedom. I can’t understand how any state government can usurp power from the CBFC which has cleared Vishwaroopam. Is one censor board not enough? Do filmmakers have to please every government and non-government body to release a film?
Ananth Mahadevan: I haven’t seen Vishwaroopam as yet. But from what I’ve gathered after its Cochin and New York shows, the film is as much an entertainer as any mass appeal film.
IANS
